Changing format for double battles

[Paiopa]

In the double battler ladder, we're only suppose to use 2 pokemon for the entire battle. I think this should be changed to have a total of 6 pokemon per team. It seems rather silly to only have 2 pokemon on the whole team and call that an actual battle. If anyone agrees, then please voice your opinions.

[meeker]

I do agree that 2 seems like too little, however, 6 seems to be a bit much. I think 4 would be a good way to test out real battling strategies. However, never participating in said battles myself, I wouldn't really know.

[cowmoo83]

I think 6 would be better. It would make use of the double battle strategies the most and would truly show the most skill. wow... it's only 2... didn't know that...

[Slizer107]

2 Pokemon isnt a true reflection of your double battle skills. All you have to do is be lucky enough to bring pokemon that completely wall yours.

[razorbeam]

double battle is more fun with 6 vs 6.

[chris001]

i agree with 6 on 6

[MissingNo.]

While I agree that two is too little, some strategies are made so that you don't have the full 6 poke party. I say make it the user's choice, 4-6.

[Loki Grants]

4x4 is enough but 6x6 is cooler XD

[Seth98]

i think 4 on 4 is better mainly because you wont have as many advantages so you have to play carefully but if you have 6 it drags the battle on. if you have 2 you just have to be lucky.

so in other words 4 on 4 shows your true skill to adapt to certain situations with limited resources i guess. makes you think more carefully.